Oh dear, what can the matter be?

I hate pouring water on an otherwise great parade but let’s consider the ramifications of the news that Tourism Noosa has appointed its Chairman to the CEO’s job.

I acknowledge the Chairman’s experience, skills and dedication. No argument. He’s been a good Chairman.

But something’s not right.

While the segue in roles seems to offer continuity, it may also be seen as a flaw; a recipe for keeping out fresh ideas.

The truth is that new insights rarely comes from long-term service. They come from fresh eyes that have had other experiences and picked up new capabilities along the way.

I’m left wondering what is expected to change at Tourism Noosa that should already have been achieved under the same (former) Chairman and now new CEO?

The move seems to herald stagnation because the Board has denied the entry of new intellect, knowledge, capability and experiences which would challenge or broaden existing thinking.

All organisations benefit from a well-considered shake-up now and then, and this mostly takes the form of a change in leadership. The reforms thereby achieved, when guided by a talented new pair of hands, can improve organisational performance and outcomes.

To go through a recruitment process aimed at renewal, gaining new perspectives and introducing new blood just to recycle the current Chairman beggars belief.

But the decision has been made so let’s turn to a number of disquieting questions.

  • Is it true the new incumbent will only occupy the CEO’s role for less than a year then take a sabbatical from which he is unlikely to return thereby triggering a new search for a CEO?
  • Is it the case that, as Chairman, the new CEO sat in on the interview process of other contenders for the job he was eventually awarded?
  • When was the Chairman’s candidacy declared and did the Board address what appears to be an evident breach of principles of good corporate governance?

If these are valid questions then, in my opinion, the process was flawed and gifted an unfair advantage to the then Chairman.

I need to declare that I’ve met and talked at length with one of the candidates short-listed for the role. In my view, he would have brought fresh insights, creativity in marketing, outstanding digital knowledge and a huge wealth of regional, national and international experience in tourism marketing.

These are all areas where new insights are desperately needed at Tourism Noosa.

Which leads to another question – has Tourism Noosa let better new talent walk away?

In defence of the appointment, it has been suggested to me that a raft of necessary changes can now be implemented to benefit the organisation before a new search is initiated.

But hold on! If that’s the case then, why were these initiatives not determined, applied and implemented under the self-same previous chairman and now CEO?

I am left somewhat bemused and concerned.

Michael Donovan FAICDom

Former Chairman Tourism NOOSA

Michael is well known in Noosa for his voluntary contribution to several flag ship enterprises. He was Chairman of Tourism Noosa and is acknowledged as preserving TN as an independent tourism organisation despite efforts to amalgamate it along with other coast tourism entities; Michael was also the inaugural Chair of Noosa Biosphere Ltd., the first successful biosphere model in Queensland; under his chairmanship the new model for The Original Eumundi Markets was established. Michael spent some 20 years in arts and entertainment, including being the Executive Producer of the NSW Bicentennial Arts Program; he has worked in corporate public affairs and holds a number of certifications in environmental tourism. He was CEO of Best Western then created and managed the biggest executive mentor service in Australia. He occasionally still lectures in corporate governance.

1 COMMENT

  1. As a sometimes cynic and oft times believer in conspiracies I’m inclined to think this decision may not benefit Noosa. Visit Sunshine Coast is the driver but like council there’s need for new vision.
    As an aside I like your statement concerning the need for organisational leadership change – it’s progressive.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.